Predatory ‘buy now pay later’ solar sales practices taken to Competition Tribunal
The Australian Competition Tribunal is currently hearing arguments on a proposed code that would apply to the ‘buy now pay later’ sales practices of solar panel and installations. It is being argued that the practices are a form of predatory lending.
Yesterday, 9th June, The Australian Competition Tribunal (Tribunal) heard the first arguments on the New Energy Tech Consumer Code (the Code), the proposed code that would apply to solar panel sales and installations. Argument revolves around the issue of buy now pay later (BNPL) finance
BNPL finance is a form of quasi-Layby, except for one crucial inimical difference – instant gratification. Unlike Layby, whereby someone can purchase a commodity via instalments and receive the product on full payment, BNPL allows you to pay in instalments but receive the product instantly.
BNPL may not sound particularly pernicious on this basis, that is until we realise that instant gratification is instantly ungratifying. Which is to say, that by using BNPL finance consumers can easily fall prey to predatory lending by not being forced down the prudential path of saving and only receiving the product when they can afford it. The consumer is now subject to an infinite variety of dangling carrots whereby only the most saintly and abstemious are likely to survive unscathed.
Consumer Action Law Centre (CALC) is making the case for the consumer, arguing that solar panel retailers offering BNPL finance are engaging in predatory unsolicited sales practices resulting in consumers being unable to service their debts and an inflated price in solar panels.
“Solar panel retailers that commit to this Code shouldn’t be using this type of unregulated finance, and that’s what we are arguing at the Tribunal,” said Gerard Brody, CEO of CALC.
CALC asserts to represent customers who have been ripped off by salespeople dangling BNPL offers; some people even claim to have been signed up to a BNPL plan without their knowledge. Moreover, CALC is set to provide the Tribunal with evidence that Australians purchasing solar panels via BNPL are being significantly overcharged for the product they receive.
“It’s tragic that at a time when we need reliable, affordable and renewable energy more than ever, unregulated buy now pay later schemes are doing damage to people and in so doing undermining confidence in the very industry they purport to promote,” said Brody.
Unlike other forms of credit, BNPL finance remains unregulated, or, at least, not regulated in the same manner. “They aren’t required to assess if the loans – sometimes in the tens of thousands of dollars – are really suitable or going to cause people substantial hardship or make them over-indebted,” continued Brody.
Kirsty Lamont from consumer group Mozo told A Current Affair in a recent investigation of BNPL finance in the retail sector that “buy now pay later is rapidly overtaking credit cards as the preferred as the preferred means of payment.” And as the method becomes more popular, the BNPL financiers are upping limits and without regulation consumers are vulnerable to finding themselves with debts they can’t service.
A solar installation is not exactly the price of a Kit-Kat, although prices are continuing to fall. However, the solar industry is built upon a model and a philosophy of sustainability, of improving customers’ lives, bank balances and the environment. Over the next few days we are going to find out if the consumer code is going to better regulate BNPL finances to better ensure the sustainability of solar sales.